evaluations

Topics: Poverty, Squatting, Homelessness Pages: 6 (732 words) Published: September 20, 2014


Evaluate the program that you designed
SHB 5314
Dr. Shannon
6/12/14
Saralyn Thompson

Project Restoration is a nonprofit Christian organization

that partners with future and current homeowners to build simple, decent, and

affordable housing for low to very low-income families. Volunteers and future

homeowners work together in the building process. Houses are sold at no profit

and owners are charged no interest. The purpose of the organization is to bring

families and communities in need together with resources and volunteers to

eliminate substandard housing in low-income areas.

Project Restoration seeks out low-income families that are willing to commit

to the vision and partner with their community to build decent living quarters. All

recipients in housing are expected to pay for the house through zero interest to

cover the material and property cost, provide hard labor through construction of the

house. (Larkin 2012)

The service providers, Coalition and the County need to agree upon what qualifies

as program success and then set up benchmarks to achieve those results. Currently the

follow-up time frame to determine client stabilization in order to measure program

success is insufficient. Program follow-up has been recorded at the three month mark

however there is no long-term tracking to determine recidivism rates. (Larkin 2012)

In analyzing the impact of HPRP on Saginaw County’s homeless, it must

be stated that beyond the number of individuals served, the program is working to

improve how the problem of homelessness is handled both in Saginaw County and

nationally. On a national level, the HPRP program focuses on “housing stabilization,”

which looks at both prevention of homelessness, as well as rehousing of the homeless. It

builds on the continuum of care model , which has been in place for more than fifteen

years. (Larkin 2012) The model links community agencies together and the Coalition has

been instrumental in bringing them all together. “Housing stabilization” adds new

elements of legal aid, credit and budget counseling, mental health and immigration with

the goal of housing stabilization for the prevention of homelessness.

Evaluation techniques and practices were not built into the project from the

beginning. The federal government released evaluation information after the RFP,

applications and contracts were signed. Therefore, the evaluation needs for the program

were not discussed and agreed to by all parties from the outset. Consequently, data

necessary for am comprehensive evaluation was not tracked and thus could not be

analyzed. (Langbein 2012)

The Saginaw County model is difficult for homeless and potentially homeless

individualist to navigate. The model requires a potential client to enter a non-profit

agency, request services and then be referred to a participating agency. If the person who

greets them is not familiar with the program, the potential client may not get served. If

the greeter refers them to the wrong place, the potential client will lose time going to the

wrong agency.

As of September 7, 2011, a total of 259 individuals had been provided homeless

preventions services (106 households) including short-term rental assistance and payment

of utility bills. However, according to Bill Sermons, director of the Homelessness

Research Institute of the National Alliance to End Homelessness, it is very difficult to

prove causation in discussing the effects of a homeless prevention program. Without a

control group, it is difficult to say with any certainty that the prevention of homelessness

is definitely attributable to the services received. So, the value of tracking the

number of seekers of homeless prevention services is unreliable....

References: Larkin, H., Beckos, B., & Martin, E. (2012). Applied integral methodological pluralism: Designing comprehensive social services program evaluation. Enacting an integral future: New horizons for integral theory.
Langbein, L. I. (2012). Public program evaluation: A statistical guide. ME Sharpe.
Evans, G. W., Wells, N. M., Chan, H. Y. E., & Saltzman, H. (2000). Housing quality and mental health. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 68(3), 526.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Evaluation and Judgment Essay
  • Recreation Evaluation Essay
  • Essay about evaluation of source
  • Training Evaluation Essay
  • Job Evaluation Schemes Essay
  • Essay on Scenario Evaluation Plan
  • Critical Evaluation Essay
  • Evaluation Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free
Ganteng Srigala | Magazines | Schnalle Ring Karten Falsch Nagel Tips Maniküre Practice Display False Nail Tips